To The Honourable Senator Gerrard Rennick,
And To Whom Else It May Concern re vaccine failure and other risks
Australia seems to be leading the world on per capita infection rate despite high vaccination rates..
Daily death rate doubling since March.
Maybe because of vaccine failure.
Following up from my comments on your Facebook posts re the Hospital System Crisis in Demand, And the Documents provided to you by the TGA re Pfizer vaccine prior to approval.
I’ve had a chance to reread these documents on a laptop vs the phone, and have noticed that the evidence is of a poor standard, that is the animal models used animals not susceptible to Covid, ie mice due to no ACE receptors, and Monkeys not prone to any serious lung disease with this infection.
I also note that one test which was off was fibrinogen, which may explain some of the sudden heart attacks in fit young people, as well as findings reported by embalmers, as opposed to coroners ( worth asking locally).
My other concerns re the paper are listed besides screenshots of the relavant parts, especially notable is the lipid nanoparticle which seems to accumulate and cause vacuolation in the liver.
I note in terms of human studies just 3 blood samples were tested in vitro ie a test tube for one reaction and that autoimmune disease and cytokine storm were named as not being looked for in this study, despite previous covid vaccines having these safety signals along with overall failure re efficacy.
As I read these documents it seems to me efficacy declines after just 5 weeks , and i note me previously mentioned concerns re pseudouridine are not addressed, nor are other issues raised by Senator Rennick re spike protein destination, longevity and shedding which should have been determined before turning human bodies into spike making machines, given the known toxicity of similar spike ie GP120, among issues pinpointed below including gentotoxic/teratogenic signals with foetal malformations in pregnancy studies on rats.
https://www.facebook.com/gerard.rennick/videos/1868022103393794
2 doses declines quickly after 5 weeks in antibody test, no comment on reduced symptoms as monkeys only get mild lung problems.
Pretty poor efficacy
They didn’t check where the spike S protein went or if/how it was broken down, especially important given modifications done to prevent normal pathways to break down by uridine substitution, and spike is the pathogenic bit of HIV
Note they talk about elimination studies of ALC-0159 instead of BNT162b2 (V9).
Then seen pathology in lymph, nodes, liver and spleen of injected rats consistent with inflammation (???autoimmunity).
Note they blank out data then say there is no need to do a repeat dose study and the “short comings” of this toxicity study shouldn’t stop approval
The claims of no effect on reproduction at beginning were contradicted at the end
Ie 50 pages later.
With all the malformations being in the vaccinated rats
Particulalry the b2 version chosen for human
The lipids were taken up by and seen in liver cells as vacuolation
Again the some protection was antibodies only and lasted 5 weeks after second injection then dropped
They didn’t test for cytokine storm which made other attempts at corona virus vaccine fail
And seems to occur in clinical use.
But the TGA is happy to let Pfizer justify not testing for this deadly adverse effect or DNA damage!! For a DNA modifying technology.
Again we didn’t check to see where the S protein went, how long it lasted or if repeated doses were toxic or they was damage to the DNA, but Pfizer justified this to the TGA who said OK
As well as we didn’t check for vaccine induced autoimmune illness but that’s OK, we’ll check after we inject as many people as possible with as many doses as possible as fast as possible.
Explaining how he turned 99% refusal to gene therapy around with the pandemic..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K09D6JN-9-Q
The vaccine formulation contains two novel excipients, 2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,Nditetradecylacetamide (ALC-0159) and ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2- hexyldecanoate) (ALC-0315).
They do efficacy studies in monkeys who only get mild lung pathology, ie are not a good animal model for severe SARS Cov 2 in humans…
Again limitted efficacy if both treatment and control groups had very mild disease.. So not sure how they can later find radiological differences as suggested.
Also note rather young monkeys used in the study
Contrast natural immunity
No evidence for older animlas or longer durations
They switched the mRNA for luficerase in degradation stdies, which is irrelevant given mRNA of vaccine modified to prevent breakdown, unlike luciferase.
Could the LNP’s be the vacuoles seen in liver cells??
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378517321003914
Hinched body, decreased activity and irregular respiration ..signs of toxicity
Also note not much radiolabelled LNP was not recoverred, so went elsewhere, note they deliberately ignored lymph nodes and claimed this was normal, also didn’t check urine, faeces or carcass to see where the lipids went
This lipid retained in liver ?? related to inflamed liver?? Or immune attack on liver cells expressing S protein???
Long half lives suggest bioaccumulation especially with repeat dosease but very weakly studied
Under major pathology they assess vaccine vs vaccine rather than vaccine vs placebo when describing pathology in various systems and organs especially Lymphn Nodes, Spleen and liver
Re risk of cytokine storm, just did in vitro studies on human blood..and small ..3 animal studies which had inconsistent results..ie not really tested ( no news is good news when tests likely to show real problems i guess)
No other animals testing
The TGA asked for toxicity studies was show fsomething for a different product and didn’t look at it.
The paper was for structurally different molecules, but TGA saud this was OK..
Scientific slight of hand
The TGA accepted this lack of evidence re safety of new molecules as acceptable, also with no evidence re genotoxic studies r genetic safety
Again mental gymnastists vs actual testing given that over a billion people were about to get repeatedly dosed.. Seems trusting ..could have looked at the DNA from one of those vacuolated liver cells just to be sure the accumulated LNPs were damaging the DNA given they were designed to allow for penetrate of cell membranes / transfection.
Note the guidlies for vaccines re gene studies, may have been from before DNA/RNA modifying technologies likeLNP/mRNA/spike combinations..
Duration of use?? Not sure they established how long the duration of mRNA with modifications to prevent digestion actually are???
They also didn’t test if immonotoxicity from injection made to impair toll like receptors occurred
Again they used 3 animals in cytokine studies and want to wait for 2 years clinical use to check for autoimmune illness vs preapproval trials???
Note the edits re safety in pregancy ie statements which were retracted..original document not me.
Note the spike is membrane anchored
So if on membrane when antigens bind, likely to face immunological attack ( as I understandit).
Look again at what was retracted re safety and genotoxity, leaving no evidence of safety, yet implications of such a plenty, especially when pushing as safe and effective to public via media
All product information and formulation redacted
On the excipients which weren’t tested by the TGA
Note also the cytokine studies which should have been done in vivo were instead done in a test tube ie in vitro, so just one type of cell vs whole body system/reaction
Most of the studies were immunogenicity, and at doses much higher than given to humans
The control monkeys were only mock challenged
And there were only 6 monkeys in study, and unlikely to get severe diseases as a species..
No significant clinical signs of illness were observed in any group of animlas including the control group.
So no clinically significant difference .. ie can’t reduce the clinical severity if there wasn’t any clinical signs of illness.
So no efficacy demonstrated just the party trick of if i inject a foreihn protein i can see an imme reaction.. Doesn’t prove those antibodies will stop infection, clinical illness, death or transmission as claimed by many “Officials”.
Note the term Transfection.. And appearance of spike by trnsfected cells ..green
What the cells were transfected with is omitted
But admission that Spike is now expressed on the surface of cells..which seems like a recipe for autoimmunity to me.
They also redacted the one cytokine study
1 of 3 test tube studies showed reduced cell viability in cytokine studies, ? immune cells killed?? Would explain negative efficacy showing up in some figures.
They didn’t do safety studies, just body temp in repeat dose studies
Look a the bioaccumulation at 48 hrs adrenal gland, liver, spleen , ovary
40-80% of radioactive material lost, ie no idea where it ends up
Didn’t seem to check beyound 48hrs
Complete redaction of metabolism of LNPs
90-100 % unchanged at 2 hrs suggests not being metabolised
Increasing fibrogen
These are massive haematological disturbances at day 17
Eg 500& increase in unstained large cells or 400-500% increase in eosinophils??? Allergy
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1-huiiTlbQkUe7h5h3XI
hsD9bbMAZRMfajsyknrYuZzF0IqUXZ8MHajXw
Note the raised fibrinogen..
Embalmers reporting massive clots blocking usual flow of embalming fluid in post mortem body preparation
https://www.bitchute.com/video/94mJYP80TREs/
Site by ex nurse / PhD. Dr Jane Ruby.
Info on fibrogen
It’s key in thrombin activation ie thrombus formation and being extra fibrous???? More fobrogen than RBC ???? ask local pathologists / morticians to confirm finding here
Vaccine effectiveness below zero
Explained in link
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1BCsnV0DGhsC/
Perhaps rather than tracing contacts we need to trace vaccinated as they go through the medical system especially with neurologic, thrombotic, autoimmune or hyperinflammatory issues to see if there is increased presentations vi the Accident and Emergency centers with some of those billions earmarked for covid treatment used to ensure safety after grossly inadequate testing as provided above by the TGA and other concerns as reported previously.
All the best,
Melissa Costin MBBS UQ ‘93
No comments:
Post a Comment