2 doses declines quickly after 5 weeks in antibody test, no comment on reducued symptoms as monkeys only get mild lung problems.
Pretty poor efficacy
They didn’t check where the spike S protein went or if/how it was broken down, especially important given modeifications done to prevent normal pathways to break down by uridine substitution, and spike is the pathogenic bit of HIV
Note they talk about elimination studies of ALC-0159 instead of BNT162b2 (V9).
Then seen pathology in lymph, nodes, liver and spleen of injected rats consistent with inflammation (???autoimmunity).
Note they blank out data then say there is no need to do a repeat dose study and the “short comings” of this toxicity study shouldn’t stop approval
The claims of no effect on reproduction at beginning were contradicted at the end
Ie 50 pages later.
With all the malformations being in the vaccinated rats
Particulalry the b2 version chosen for human
The lipids were taken up by and seen in liver cells as vacuolation
Again the some protection was antibodies only and lasted 5 weeks after second injection then dropped
They didn’t test for cytokine storm which made other attempts at corona virus vaccine fail
And seems to occur in clinical use.
But the TGA is happy to let Pfizer justify not testing for this deadly adverse effect or DNA damage!! For a DNA modifying technology.
Again we didn’t check to see where the S protein went, how long it lasted or if repeated doses were toxic or they was damage to the DNA, but Pfizer justified this to the TGA who said OK
As well as we didn’t check for vaccine induced autoimmune illness but that’s OK, we’ll check after we inject as many people as possible with as many doses as possible as fast as possible.
Explaining how he turned 99% refusal to gene therapy around with the pandemic..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K09D6JN-9-Q
The vaccine formulation contains two novel excipients, 2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,Nditetradecylacetamide (ALC-0159) and ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2- hexyldecanoate) (ALC-0315).
They do efficacy studies in monkeys who only get mild lung pathology, ie are not a good animal model for severe SARS Cov 2 in humans…
Again limitted efficacy if both treatment and control groups had very mild disease.. So not sure how they can later find radiological differences as suggested.
Also note rather young monkeys used in the study
Contrast natural immunity
No evidence for older animlas or longer durations
They switched the mRNA for luficerase in degradation stdies, which is irrelevant given mRNA of vaccine modified to prevent breakdown, unlike luciferase.
Could the LNP’s be the vacuoles seen in liver cells??
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378517321003914
Hinched body, decreased activity and irregular respiration ..signs of toxicity
Also note not much radiolabelled LNP was not recoverred, so went elsewhere, note they deliberately ignored lymph nodes and claimed this was normal, also didn’t check urine, faeces or carcass to see where the lipids went
This lipid retained in liver ?? related to inflamed liver?? Or immune attack on liver cells expressing S protein???
Long half lives suggest bioaccumulation especially with repeat dosease but very weakly studied
Under major pathology they assess vaccine vs vaccine rather than vaccine vs placebo when describing pathology in various systems and organs especially Lymphn Nodes, Spleen and liver
Re risk of cytokine storm, just did in vitro studies on human blood..and small ..3 animal studies which had inconsistent results..ie not really tested ( no news is good news when tests likely to show real problems i guess)
No other animals testing
The TGA asked for toxicity studies was show fsomething for a different product and didn’t look at it.
The paper was for structurally different molecules, but TGA saud this was OK..
Scientific slight of hand
The TGA accepted this lack of evidence re safety of new molecules as acceptable, also with no evidence re genotoxic studies r genetic safety
Again mental gymnastists vs actual testing given that over a billion people were about to get repeatedly dosed.. Seems trusting ..could have looked at the DNA from one of those vacuolated liver cells just to be sure the accumulated LNPs were damaging the DNA given they were designed to allow for penetrate of cell membranes / transfection.
Note the guidlies for vaccines re gene studies, may have been from before DNA/RNA modifying technologies likeLNP/mRNA/spike combinations..
Duration of use?? Not sure they established how long the duration of mRNA with modifications to prevent digestion actually are???
They also didn’t test if immonotoxicity from injection made to impair toll like receptors occurred
Again they used 3 animals in cytokine studies and want to wait for 2 years clinical use to check for autoimmune illness vs preapproval trials???
Note the edits re safety in pregancy ie statements which were retracted..original document not me.
Note the spike is membrane anchored
So if on membrane when antigens bind, likely to face immunological attack ( as I understandit).
Look again at what was retracted re safety and genotoxity, leaving no evidence of safety, yet implications of such a plenty, especially when pushing as safe and effective to public via media
All product information and formulation redacted
On the excipients which weren’t tested by the TGA
Note also the cytokine studies which should have been done in vivo were instead done in a test tube ie in vitro, so just one type of cell vs whole body system/reaction
Most of the studies were immunogenicity, and at doses much higher than given to humans
The control monkeys were only mock challenged
And there were only 6 monkeys in study, and unlikely to get severe diseases as a species..
No significant clinical signs of illness were observed in any group of animlas including the control group.
So no clinically significant difference .. ie can’t reduce the clinical severity if there wasn’t any clinical signs of illness.
So no efficacy demonstrated just the party trick of if i inject a foreihn protein i can see an imme reaction.. Doesn’t prove those antibodies will stop infection, clinical illness, death or transmission as claimed by many “Officials”.
Note the term Transfection.. And appearance of spike by trnsfected cells ..green
What the cells were transfected with is omitted
But admission that Spike is now expressed on the surface of cells..which seems like a recipe for autoimmunity to me.
They also redacted the one cytokine study
1 of 3 test tube studies showed reduced cell viability in cytokine studies, ? immune cells killed?? Would explain negative efficacy showing up in some figures.
They didn’t do safety studies, just body temp in repeat dose studies
Look a the bioaccumulation at 48 hrs adrenal gland, liver, spleen , ovary
40-80% of radioactive material lost, ie no idea where it ends up
Didn’t seem to check beyound 48hrs
Complete redaction of metabolism of LNPs
90-100 % unchanged at 2 hrs suggests not being metabolised
Increasing fibrogen
These are massive haematological disturbances at day 17
Eg 500& increase in unstained large cells or 400-500% increase in eosinophils??? Allergy
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1-huiiTlbQkUe7h5h3XI
hsD9bbMAZRMfajsyknrYuZzF0IqUXZ8MHajXw
I also note the local hospital system is in crisis
South Brisbane Chief Superintendent Bill Graham
Australian College of Accident and Emergency Medicine Queensland Chair, Dr Kim Hansen
No where to put the patient in a Crisis..
https://www.facebook.com/gerard.rennick/videos/1868022103393794
Even the AMA sees the crisis and that Gov isn’t up to resolve it.
It seems to me now is the time to split mental health crisis from the emergency department, I’ve been there twice as a dumping ground when the system in place fails me, that is support staff and housing refuse to help me with serious violence and ongoing bullying.. This is a Police matter, but when Police fail victims of trauma, the emotional distress gets medicalised..
I have made multiple submission to various levels of government in State Police, Health and Housing and ultimately get dumped in the psychiatric system rather than given the Justice necessary to recover from a violent attack.
As per my previous submissions.
I conclude the failure to address or even recognise the underlying issues of mental health along with medicalising social issues ie calling extreme PTSD psychosis vs prolonged intense stress.. will worsen this by adding mind numbing, physically impairing cocktails of chemicals, plus intereactions with alcohol, other drugs and social stressors which is what we see with people in social distress like me.. It doesn’t matter how many admissions or drugs given if one goes home to threats of violence and abuse mental illness will decline and acting out distress either via self harm or other attention seeking behaviour will not stop until abuse does.
This fundamental lack of understanding or wholistic approaches will perpetuate the continous decline in people being violently assaulted and perpetually itimidated by those given free reign to do so by police dismissing distress as mental illness and then trying to dump such on health and housing as my case shows.
I think we need dedicated mental health services in the community, which can stabilise as many as possible and only transfer the guineley mentally ill.. In my experience with seriously mentally ill people, in both hospital and community settings personally and professionall firmly leads me to believe that police / hospital settings only cause mental decine of people in distress, and more money needs to be used to actually help such people versus label and drug them as mentally ill and lock them in psychiatric wards with equally drugged and distressed people.
I have offerred my case/ experience in the past to those responsible only to feel ignored/ threatened to keep quiet.
Now it’s the same people ignoring me who have to face that the problem isn’t me but systemic and worsening to the distress/detriment of the staff and state Police and Hospital systems.
No comments:
Post a Comment